Awesome Open Source
Awesome Open Source

.. note that this README gets 'include'ed into the main documentation

============================================== trustme: #1 quality TLS certs while you wait

.. image:: :width: 200px :align: right

You wrote a cool network client or server. It encrypts connections using TLS <>__. Your test suite needs to make TLS connections to itself.

Uh oh. Your test suite probably doesn't have a valid TLS certificate. Now what?

trustme is a tiny Python package that does one thing: it gives you a fake <>__ certificate authority (CA) that you can use to generate fake TLS certs to use in your tests. Well, technically they're real certs, they're just signed by your CA, which nobody trusts. But you can trust it. Trust me.

Vital statistics

Install: pip install -U trustme


Bug tracker and source code:

Tested on: Python 2.7 and Python 3.5+, CPython and PyPy

License: MIT or Apache 2, your choice.

Code of conduct: Contributors are requested to follow our code of conduct <>__ in all project spaces.

Cheat sheet

.. code-block:: python

import trustme

----- Creating certs -----

Look, you just created your own certificate authority!

ca = trustme.CA()

And now you issued a cert signed by this fake CA

server_cert = ca.issue_cert(u"")

That's it!

----- Using your shiny new certs -----

You can configure SSL context objects to trust this CA:


Or configure them to present the server certificate


You can use standard library or PyOpenSSL context objects here,

trustme is happy either way.

----- or -----

Save the PEM-encoded data to a file to use in non-Python test


ca.cert_pem.write_to_path("ca.pem") server_cert.private_key_and_cert_chain_pem.write_to_path("server.pem")

----- or -----

Put the PEM-encoded data in a temporary file, for libraries that

insist on that:

with ca.cert_pem.tempfile() as ca_temp_path: requests.get("https://...", verify=ca_temp_path)


Should I use these certs for anything real? Certainly not.

Why not just use self-signed certificates? These are more realistic. You don't have to disable your certificate validation code in your test suite, which is good, because you want to test what you run in production, and you would never disable your certificate validation code in production, right? Plus they're just as easy to work with. Actually easier, in many cases.

What if I want to test how my code handles some really weird TLS configuration? Sure, I'm happy to extend the API to give more control over the generated certificates, at least as long as it doesn't turn into a second-rate re-export of everything in cryptography <>. (If you really need a fully general X.509 library then they do a great job at that.) Let's talk <>, or send a PR.

Get A Weekly Email With Trending Projects For These Topics
No Spam. Unsubscribe easily at any time.
python (48,451
testing (881
testing-tools (188
ssl (179
tls (176
ssl-certificate (25

Find Open Source By Browsing 7,000 Topics Across 59 Categories