Rse Adversarial Defense

An implementation for "Defense of Word-level Adversarial Attacks via Random Substitution Encoding"
Alternatives To Rse Adversarial Defense
Project NameStarsDownloadsRepos Using ThisPackages Using ThisMost Recent CommitTotal ReleasesLatest ReleaseOpen IssuesLicenseLanguage
Firecrack560
8 months ago39
:fire: Firecrack pentest tools: Facebook hacking random attack, deface, admin finder, bing dorking:
Damnvulnerablecryptoapp81
a year ago20mitTypeScript
An app with really insecure crypto. To be used to see/test/exploit weak cryptographic implementations as well as to learn a little bit more about crypto, without the need to dive deep into the math behind it
Manzana Attack45
5 years ago3gpl-3.0Rust
A game about throwing apples at random people. Based on a true story.
Petya_green19
7 years ago2C++
Application for random attack on Green Petya's key
Skiddiemonkeys10
9 years agogpl-3.0Python
Rse Adversarial Defense7
3 years agoPython
An implementation for "Defense of Word-level Adversarial Attacks via Random Substitution Encoding"
Xkcdpass6
7 years agomitRuby
A passphrase generator
Attack And Anomaly Detection In Iot Sensors In Iot Sites Using Machine Learning Approaches6
5 years agomitJupyter Notebook
Attack and Anomaly detection in the Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructure is a rising concern in the domain of IoT. With the increased use of IoT infrastructure in every domain, threats and attacks in these infrastructures are also growing commensurately. Denial of Service, Data Type Probing, Malicious Control, Malicious Operation, Scan, Spying and Wrong Setup are such attacks and anomalies which can cause an IoT system failure. In this paper, performances of several machine learning models have been compared to predict attacks and anomalies on the IoT systems accurately. The machine learning (ML) algorithms that have been used here are Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The evaluation metrics used in the comparison of performance are accuracy, precision, recall, f1 score, and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. The system obtained 99.4% test accuracy for Decision Tree, Random Forest, and ANN. Though these techniques have the same accuracy, other metrics prove that Random Forest performs comparatively better.
Unbound Bloomfilter5
8 years ago2bsd-3-clauseGroff
Random subdomain attack mitigation using bloom filter for Unbound
Alternatives To Rse Adversarial Defense
Select To Compare


Alternative Project Comparisons
Popular Random Projects
Popular Attack Projects
Popular Mathematics Categories

Get A Weekly Email With Trending Projects For These Categories
No Spam. Unsubscribe easily at any time.
Python
Random
Attack