Tstorage

An embedded time-series database
Alternatives To Tstorage
Project NameStarsDownloadsRepos Using ThisPackages Using ThisMost Recent CommitTotal ReleasesLatest ReleaseOpen IssuesLicenseLanguage
Influxdb25,1126321,0375 days ago639August 18, 20221,728mitGo
Scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics
Tdengine21,065114 hours ago12April 14, 2022873agpl-3.0C
TDengine is an open source, high-performance, cloud native time-series database optimized for Internet of Things (IoT), Connected Cars, Industrial IoT and DevOps.
Victoriametrics8,213420 hours ago174September 08, 2022633apache-2.0Go
VictoriaMetrics: fast, cost-effective monitoring solution and time series database
Lindb2,602
6 days ago10July 31, 20197apache-2.0Go
LinDB is a scalable, high performance, high availability distributed time series database.
Oban2,5212103 days ago61September 23, 20228apache-2.0Elixir
💎 Robust job processing in Elixir, backed by modern PostgreSQL or SQLite3
Kairosdb1,689
15 days ago124apache-2.0Java
Fast scalable time series database
Pgwatch21,487
4 days ago35April 25, 20222bsd-3-clausePLpgSQL
PostgreSQL metrics monitor/dashboard
Filodb1,374
10 days ago27apache-2.0Scala
Distributed Prometheus time series database
Whisper1,189
a month ago5March 12, 20192apache-2.0Python
Whisper is a file-based time-series database format for Graphite.
Pome1,083
3 years agoFebruary 27, 201617apache-2.0Go
A Postgres Metrics Dashboard
Alternatives To Tstorage
Select To Compare


Alternative Project Comparisons
Readme

tstorage Go Reference

tstorage is a lightweight local on-disk storage engine for time-series data with a straightforward API. Especially ingestion is massively optimized as it provides goroutine safe capabilities of write into and read from TSDB that partitions data points by time.

Motivation

I'm working on a couple of tools that handle a tremendous amount of time-series data, such as Ali and Gosivy. Especially Ali, I had been facing a problem of increasing heap consumption over time as it's a load testing tool that aims to perform real-time analysis. I little poked around a fast TSDB library that offers simple APIs but eventually nothing works as well as I'd like, that's why I settled on writing this package myself.

To see how much tstorage has helped improve Ali's performance, see the release notes here.

Usage

Currently, tstorage requires Go version 1.16 or greater

By default, tstorage.Storage works as an in-memory database. The below example illustrates how to insert a row into the memory and immediately select it.

package main

import (
	"fmt"

	"github.com/nakabonne/tstorage"
)

func main() {
	storage, _ := tstorage.NewStorage(
		tstorage.WithTimestampPrecision(tstorage.Seconds),
	)
	defer storage.Close()

	_ = storage.InsertRows([]tstorage.Row{
		{
			Metric: "metric1",
			DataPoint: tstorage.DataPoint{Timestamp: 1600000000, Value: 0.1},
		},
	})
	points, _ := storage.Select("metric1", nil, 1600000000, 1600000001)
	for _, p := range points {
		fmt.Printf("timestamp: %v, value: %v\n", p.Timestamp, p.Value)
		// => timestamp: 1600000000, value: 0.1
	}
}

Using disk

To make time-series data persistent on disk, specify the path to directory that stores time-series data through WithDataPath option.

storage, _ := tstorage.NewStorage(
	tstorage.WithDataPath("./data"),
)
defer storage.Close()

Labeled metrics

In tstorage, you can identify a metric with combination of metric name and optional labels. Here is an example of insertion a labeled metric to the disk.

metric := "mem_alloc_bytes"
labels := []tstorage.Label{
	{Name: "host", Value: "host-1"},
}

_ = storage.InsertRows([]tstorage.Row{
	{
		Metric:    metric,
		Labels:    labels,
		DataPoint: tstorage.DataPoint{Timestamp: 1600000000, Value: 0.1},
	},
})
points, _ := storage.Select(metric, labels, 1600000000, 1600000001)

For more examples see the documentation.

Benchmarks

Benchmark tests were made using Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz with 16GB of RAM on macOS 10.15.7

$ go version
go version go1.16.2 darwin/amd64

$ go test -benchtime=4s -benchmem -bench=. .
goos: darwin
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/nakabonne/tstorage
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz
BenchmarkStorage_InsertRows-8                  	14135685	       305.9 ns/op	     174 B/op	       2 allocs/op
BenchmarkStorage_SelectAmongThousandPoints-8   	20548806	       222.4 ns/op	      56 B/op	       2 allocs/op
BenchmarkStorage_SelectAmongMillionPoints-8    	16185709	       292.2 ns/op	      56 B/op	       1 allocs/op
PASS
ok  	github.com/nakabonne/tstorage	16.501s

Internal

Time-series database has specific characteristics in its workload. In terms of write operations, a time-series database has to ingest a tremendous amount of data points ordered by time. Time-series data is immutable, mostly an append-only workload with delete operations performed in batches on less recent data. In terms of read operations, in most cases, we want to retrieve multiple data points by specifying its time range, also, most recent first: query the recent data in real-time. Besides, time-series data is already indexed in time order.

Based on these characteristics, tstorage adopts a linear data model structure that partitions data points by time, totally different from the B-trees or LSM trees based storage engines. Each partition acts as a fully independent database containing all data points for its time range.

                   
Read              Write
                   
                   V
         max: 1600010800
  >   Memory Partition
         min: 1600007201
  
         max: 1600007200
  >   Memory Partition
         min: 1600003601
  
         max: 1600003600
  >   Disk Partition
          min: 1600000000

Key benefits:

  • We can easily ignore all data outside of the partition time range when querying data points.
  • Most read operations work fast because recent data get cached in heap.
  • When a partition gets full, we can persist the data from our in-memory database by sequentially writing just a handful of larger files. We avoid any write-amplification and serve SSDs and HDDs equally well.

Memory partition

The memory partition is writable and stores data points in heap. The head partition is always memory partition. Its next one is also memory partition to accept out-of-order data points. It stores data points in an ordered Slice, which offers excellent cache hit ratio compared to linked lists unless it gets updated way too often (like delete, add elements at random locations).

All incoming data is written to a write-ahead log (WAL) right before inserting into a memory partition to prevent data loss.

Disk partition

The old memory partitions get compacted and persisted to the directory prefixed with p-, under the directory specified with the WithDataPath option. Here is the macro layout of disk partitions:

$ tree ./data
./data
 p-1600000001-1600003600
  data
  meta.json
 p-1600003601-1600007200
  data
  meta.json
 p-1600007201-1600010800
     data
     meta.json

As you can see each partition holds two files: meta.json and data. The data is compressed, read-only and is memory-mapped with mmap(2) that maps a kernel address space to a user address space. Therefore, what it has to store in heap is only partition's metadata. Just looking at meta.json gives us a good picture of what it stores:

$ cat ./data/p-1600000001-1600003600/meta.json
{
  "minTimestamp": 1600000001,
  "maxTimestamp": 1600003600,
  "numDataPoints": 7200,
  "metrics": {
    "metric-1": {
      "name": "metric-1",
      "offset": 0,
      "minTimestamp": 1600000001,
      "maxTimestamp": 1600003600,
      "numDataPoints": 3600
    },
    "metric-2": {
      "name": "metric-2",
      "offset": 36014,
      "minTimestamp": 1600000001,
      "maxTimestamp": 1600003600,
      "numDataPoints": 3600
    }
  }
}

Each metric has its own file offset of the beginning. Data point slice for each metric is compressed separately, so all we have to do when reading is to seek, and read the points off.

Out-of-order data points

What data points get out-of-order in real-world applications is not uncommon because of network latency or clock synchronization issues; tstorage basically doesn't discard them. If out-of-order data points are within the range of the head memory partition, they get temporarily buffered and merged at flush time. Sometimes we should handle data points that cross a partition boundary. That is the reason why tstorage keeps more than one partition writable.

More

Want to know more details on tstorage internal? If so see the blog post: Write a time-series database engine from scratch.

Acknowledgements

This package is implemented based on tons of existing ideas. What I especially got inspired by are:

A big "thank you!" goes out to all of them.

Popular Database Projects
Popular Metrics Projects
Popular Data Storage Categories
Related Searches

Get A Weekly Email With Trending Projects For These Categories
No Spam. Unsubscribe easily at any time.
Golang
Database
Metrics
Time Series
Golang Library